Automatically remove reviewers from Level 6 (a.k.a. editors) if they have not scored (a.k.a. edited) at least 30 reviews in the past 30 days
complete
Scott Hughes
This is especially important considering the following recent change:
To accomplish it, I think it's best to add a column to the reviewer preferences database like inactive_editor_probation_last_start to give an editor a two week warning before removal. Then we can use a daily or weekly cron job to pull up any Level 6 reviewers who haven't edited 30 reviews in the past month but who were not already reminded in the last two weeks (i.e. where inactive_editor_probation_last_start < ( time() - (86400*14) ) ) to either send the warning and set inactive_editor_probation_last_start with the current time or remove the editor and send a notification email that they have been removed from level 6.
Stephanie Runyon
I was removed immediately and I have a reviewer score of 94.
Scott Hughes
complete
Editors won't be removed unless they have already been warned about falling below thresholds within the last 60 days, AND (as an extra courtesy) they won't be removed unless BOTH their one-week average and one-month average are below 3-per-day. So, for instance, an editor could miss an entire two weeks of editing and still wouldn't be removed, as long as they get to doing 21+ per week every week after that; they wouldn't even technically need to make up for the missed weeks.
P
Priya Murugesan
Scott Hughes I was removed immediately from level 6 without any warning even though I had completed 71 reviews in 31 days. What is the reason for that?
A
Alicia McLain
Why can’t amended reviews be sent back to the same reviewer who suggested the amendments? I’ve been waiting months to be paid for a review that simply needed page numbers added to my error log. Could have easily just been bounced back to the editor who caught my error and I could’ve been paid months ago.
Mayang Bature
Implementing this change will motivate editors to edit more reviews and I think that's going to be the solution to this problem. However, I think that immediately removing editors without warning could cause more backlogs in the long run because new editors may not be gotten as fast.
Also, temporarily increasing the editor weekly limit until after the backlog is cleared may help in speeding up the process.
Ultimately, I think carrying out this change as planned would be the the best course of action.
Ansalna Majeed
Please apply those above mentioned changes to improve the online books club experience great and fast.
Anthony Caleb
It will great to see this implimented swiftly as it's been over a month and my reviews have not gotten a moderator scorecard. Please something needs to be done quickly. Thank you.
Rana Ayman
Hello, would you please advise when abovementioned change to be applied as it has been more than 3 weeks and my reviews still have not get scorecards
Bat Man
My last two reviews are still pending. What is the reason behind this?
Prudence Katunasa
Yes I agree that editors should complete thirty reviews in thirty days and be penalized if they don't meet this standard. However, removing editors immediately without warning wouldn't be the best route to take as we don't know how fast those editors will be replaced and we don't want a shortage of editors.
S
Sarah zain
I agree that there should be rules for editors. I am suffering now because there is no scorecard for my review that I submitted since July 3rd, and more than ten days have passed after the two-week deadline. But, I can't judge about the number of reviews required to be submitted by the editors, however I think that the editor can choose between what they can provide in order to commit to it.
Load More
→